The Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected interim bail for Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in a corruption case filed by the CBI, stemming from the alleged excise policy scam case.
A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan issued a notice to the CBI in the plea, where he challenged his arrest and sought bail. The court scheduled the matter for hearing on August 23, stating "no interim bail for now".
Senior Advocate Abhishek Singhvi, who appeared for Kejriwal, sought interim bail on health grounds as Justice Surya Kant directed the issuance of a notice.
“We have filed for interim bail due to health issues,” Singhvi said. In response, Justice Kant replied, “No interim bail.”
Singhvi argued, “Just when the ED judgment was about to be delivered, the CBI arrested him. There are health issues involved, and we are pressing for interim bail.”
He also mentioned that Krijwail was granted bail on three occasions, including in the ED case, where the stringent Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) comes into play.
Justice Kant responded, “We are not granting any interim bail. We are issuing a notice".
The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) chief moved the Supreme Court after the Delhi High Court rejected his challenge to the CBI arrest. He has already got bail from the top court in a case by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) linked to the alleged liquor policy scam.
The Delhi Chief Minister was arrested by the Enforcement Directorate on March 21, 2024, in a case related to the now-scrapped liquor policy of the AAP government in the national capital. He was later arrested by the CBI as well.
The Supreme Court had granted interim bail to Kejriwal in the ED case on July 12.
The Delhi High Court had on August 5 rejected Kejriwal's plea and upheld that his arrest by the CBI was legal, noting that there was no malice in the acts of the central agency. The court stated that the arrest was made only after sufficient evidence was collected and sanction was obtained.
The CBI had argued that the AAP supremo could influence witnesses who might muster the courage to depose only after his arrest.
Kejriwal, before the High Court, had stated that as the National Convenor of a national political party and a sitting Chief Minister, he was being subjected to "gross persecution and harassment for wholly malafide [in bad faith] and extraneous considerations".
However, the High Court stated, "...it establishes that the loop of evidence against the petitioner got closed after the collection of relevant evidence after his arrest. No malice whatsoever can be gathered from the acts of the respondent (CBI)”.
Kejriwal’s bail came before the top court days after senior AAP leader and former Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia was granted bail in the same case by the Supreme Court after spending 17 months in jail.
According to the central probe agencies, irregularities were committed in modifying the excise policy, and undue favours were extended to licence holders by the Delhi government in 2022. The policy was scrapped after the Delhi Lieutenant Governor ordered a CBI probe into the alleged irregularities and corruption.
Source: India Today